H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Shaun Stafford vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–0 lead over Shaun Stafford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1994 Sydney fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shaun Stafford
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 1-6 6-2 6-1 Shaun Stafford #73 Match data
Sep 26, 1992* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-1 6-1 Shaun Stafford #175 Match data
Jun 27, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6 6-3 Shaun Stafford #104 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shaun Stafford #803 #48 31 1,772 90 132 40.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shaun Stafford Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1987 0–2 0.0% #189 1,483 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1988 1–5 16.7% #121 1,470 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1989 17–15 53.1% #51 1,672 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1990 6–18 25.0% #150 1,589 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1991 10–17 37.0% #102 1,578 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1992 9–12 42.9% #68 1,660 0 1 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1993 16–18 47.1% #74 1,668 0 1 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1994 17–19 47.2% #55 1,716 0 1 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1995 13–20 39.4% #97 1,640 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1996 1–6 14.3% #388 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8