H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sheila Mcinerney vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 0-1

Kay Mcdaniel holds a 1–0 lead over Sheila Mcinerney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kay Mcdaniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kay Mcdaniel won the 1980 San Diego round of 32 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sheila Mcinerney
USA Age 68
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kay Mcdaniel
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kay Mcdaniel 6-2 7-6 Sheila Mcinerney Match data Jul 31, 1980* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sheila Mcinerney — — — 1,586 27 39 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kay Mcdaniel — — — 1,653 18 40 31.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sheila Mcinerney Kay Mcdaniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,515 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
19 1977 2–2 50.0% — 1,521 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1978 2–5 28.6% — 1,488 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,520 0 0
21 1979 1–2 33.3% — 1,473 0 0 1979 10–12 45.5% — 1,625 0 0
22 1980 3–9 25.0% — 1,454 0 0 1980 2–12 14.3% — 1,554 0 0
23 1981 10–7 58.8% — 1,543 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,528 0 0
24 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,495 0 0 1982 1–3 25.0% — 1,501 0 0
25 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sheila Mcinerney Kay Mcdaniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 2 10 12 16.7% 10 14 24 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sheila Mcinerney Kay Mcdaniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1516 99.4 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% -0.28 1–0 — — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1498 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
19 1977 1521 117.1 — — — — — — — 55.6% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.13 1977 1486 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
20 1978 1488 107.3 — — — — — — — 38.5% +0.15 0–1 0–2 — +0.48 1978 1520 109.0 — — — — +104 — — 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
21 1979 1473 98.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — +0.82 1979 1625 126.4 — — — — +23 — +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.41
22 1980 1455 103.3 — — — — +53 — — 24.0% -2.08 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.25 1980 1555 99.2 — — — — -19 — +36 21.9% -2.47 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.34
23 1981 1543 116.0 — — — — +10 — +59 57.1% +0.60 1–0 1–0 — +0.88 1981 1528 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.09
24 1982 1496 103.7 — — — — -26 +23 — 38.6% -0.95 1–3 (25%) 0–4 (0%) 93.8 +1.43 1982 1501 104.3 — — — — +21 — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
25 1983 1499 99.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1485 96.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1454 95.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1447 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.02
Career — 1586 111.3 — — — — +27 +23 +59 42.0% -0.51 4–6 (40%) 2–8 (20%) 93.7 +6.55 — 1653 110.7 — — — — +19 +25 +29 34.8% -1.20 8–11 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.3 +2.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.