H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Shelley Solomon vs Trey Lewis H2H: 1-0

Shelley Solomon holds a 1–0 lead over Trey Lewis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shelley Solomon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shelley Solomon won the 1984 Berlin Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelley Solomon 6-2 6-2 Trey Lewis Match data May 16, 1984* R64 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shelley Solomon — — — 1,681 40 49 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trey Lewis — — — 1,534 23 54 29.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shelley Solomon Trey Lewis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1981 7–4 63.6% — 1,564 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
19 1982 14–10 58.3% — 1,634 0 0 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,521 0 1
20 1983 13–17 43.3% — 1,612 0 0 1980 6–15 28.6% — 1,512 0 1
21 1984 6–15 28.6% — 1,503 0 0 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,518 0 1
22 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,481 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,476 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,447 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,441 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shelley Solomon Trey Lewis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0%
21 1984 0 6 6 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 19 35 45.7% 11 17 28 39.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — 11 24 35 31.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shelley Solomon Trey Lewis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1981 1565 116.5 — — — — — — — 68.2% +1.36 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 1978 1503 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
19 1982 1635 112.9 — — — — +21 — — 56.1% +0.35 5–4 (56%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.69 1979 1521 113.4 — — — — +80 +57 — 47.1% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.1 +0.83
20 1983 1613 110.6 — — — — +8 -20 — 44.3% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.6 +1.57 1980 1512 113.3 — — — — +27 — — 31.9% -1.02 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 +1.20
21 1984 1503 98.6 — — — — -27 +85 — 31.1% -1.51 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.71 1981 1519 114.6 — — — — +61 +9 — 41.7% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 93.6 -0.11
22 1985 1487 104.8 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.87 0–2 — — -0.33 1982 1481 106.7 — — — — +19 +4 — 37.1% -0.69 2–7 (22%) 0–2 — +0.77
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1477 100.5 — — — — +8 — +60 39.1% -0.57 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +0.74
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1447 90.5 — — — — -3 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +1.07
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1442 100.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1682 111.2 — — — — +8 +41 — 46.5% -0.32 12–14 (46%) 2–9 (18%) 94.5 +5.38 — 1534 111.0 — — — — +29 +19 +60 37.8% -0.70 9–25 (26%) 6–20 (23%) 83.2 +5.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.