H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sherry Acker vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 1-4
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 4–1 lead over Sherry Acker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sherry Acker won the 1981 US Open first round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sherry Acker | 7-6 6-4 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1979* | Minneapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Betty Ann Grubb | 7-6 6-2 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| May 17, 1979* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-2 6-2 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1979* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 2-6 6-3 6-0 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1979 | Orlando | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-1 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherry Acker | — | — | — | 1,840 | 63 | 100 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sherry Acker | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 29–31 | 48.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1984 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |