H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sherry Acker vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 0-1
Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Sherry Acker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1983 Manhattan Beach second round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1983* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Heather Ludloff | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherry Acker | — | — | — | 1,840 | 63 | 100 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sherry Acker | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 29–31 | 48.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |