H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Sherry Acker vs Kathleen Cummings H2H: 1-0

Sherry Acker holds a 1–0 lead over Kathleen Cummings in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sherry Acker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sherry Acker won the 1981 Mahwah round of 64 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sherry Acker 6-3 6-4 Kathleen Cummings Match data Aug 26, 1981* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sherry Acker — — — 1,844 63 100 38.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathleen Cummings — — — 1,681 38 50 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sherry Acker Kathleen Cummings
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1980 9–3 75.0% — 1,595 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,597 0 0
20 1979 13–21 38.2% — 1,591 0 0 1982 11–8 57.9% — 1,622 0 0
21 1980 29–31 48.3% — 1,832 0 0 1983 2–3 40.0% — 1,643 0 0
22 1981 8–19 29.6% — 1,682 0 0 1984 8–13 38.1% — 1,589 0 0
23 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,632 0 0 1985 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0
24 1983 11–15 42.3% — 1,619 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
25 1984 1–9 10.0% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sherry Acker Kathleen Cummings
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1979 7 6 13 53.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 17 18 35 48.6% 1983 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1981 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1984 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1984 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 29 49 40.8% 7 13 20 35.0% 14 25 39 35.9% 22 33 55 40.0% — 24 27 51 47.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sherry Acker Kathleen Cummings
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1595 117.3 — — — — +73 — — 70.4% +1.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +2.25
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1598 117.1 — — — — +58 -41 — 30.0% -1.47 1–1 1–1 — -0.77
20 1979 1592 125.7 — — — — +77 -54 -63 40.0% -0.87 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 +2.58 1982 1623 114.9 — — — — +7 — — 61.9% +0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 91.8 +1.23
21 1980 1833 147.5 — — — — +12 -287 -234 47.8% -0.02 10–8 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 106.3 -3.15 1983 1644 105.4 — — — — +8 — — 36.4% -2.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.21
22 1981 1683 125.7 — — — — +54 -94 -123 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 94.0 -2.47 1984 1590 99.3 — — — — +25 — -48 38.0% -1.16 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.13
23 1982 1632 123.1 — — — — — — -42 33.3% -0.87 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18 1985 1504 99.6 — — — — +9 +26 +10 25.0% -2.09 — 0–1 — +1.83
24 1983 1620 119.1 — — — — +5 — +38 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 102.8 +0.08 1986 1492 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
25 1984 1524 98.7 — — — — -5 — — 24.0% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1844 135.7 — — — — +28 -151 -74 40.4% -0.56 19–26 (42%) 15–23 (39%) 97.2 -1.35 — 1682 111.6 — — — — +31 -8 -19 43.8% -0.56 9–9 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 98.0 +6.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.