H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sherry Acker vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-0
Sherry Acker holds a 1–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sherry Acker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sherry Acker won the 1983 Sydney third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1983* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Sherry Acker | 7-5 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sherry Acker | — | — | — | 1,840 | 63 | 100 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sherry Acker | Raffaella Reggi Concato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1980 | 29–31 | 48.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1981 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1984 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 |