H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Shi-Ting Wang vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(5) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shi-Ting Wang #46 7-6(5) 6-1 Andrea Temesvari #106 Match data Jan 17, 1996* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shi-Ting Wang — #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,805 0 6 — — — — — — —
23 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,682 0 6 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.90 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1682 134.6 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -67 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.23 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -69 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.92 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.