H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Ann Grossman H2H: 0-1
Ann Grossman holds a 1–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1992 Taipei quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Ann Grossman | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |