H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 1-0
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1992 Osaka third round 2-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1992* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Shi-Ting Wang | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Ann Henricksson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |