Shi-Ting Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Cammy Macgregor H2H: 1-0
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Cammy Macgregor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1993 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 6-2 | Cammy Macgregor | Match data | Sep 17, 1993* | R16 | Hong Kong Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,831 | 129 | 106 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Cammy Macgregor | #625 | #75 | 14 | 1,604 | 48 | 87 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Cammy Macgregor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #77 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Cammy Macgregor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1987 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1995 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 1996 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 72 | 184 | 60.9% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 32 | 48 | 80 | 40.0% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 6 | 16 | 22 | 27.3% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Cammy Macgregor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1492 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 1479 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1510 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.13 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.27 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1535 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | +100 | 38.7% | -0.81 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | +0.56 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1605 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 50.9% | +0.09 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.89 | 1987 | 1522 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | -14 | 37.7% | -0.89 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.9 | +3.39 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1780 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 65.7% | +1.22 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +0.48 | 1988 | 1504 | 126.9 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 37.1% | -0.89 | 0–5 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 91.1 | +0.12 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1776 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -187 | — | 59.7% | +0.78 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.94 | 1989 | 1577 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 43.9% | -0.68 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–1 (75%) | 105.5 | +0.60 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1776 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -152 | — | 62.3% | +1.00 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–1 | — | +1.57 | 1990 | 1518 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -16 | — | 38.2% | -1.11 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.7 | +0.99 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1805 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -168 | — | 62.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | +1.15 | 1991 | 1521 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -24 | — | 41.4% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.9 | +0.55 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1682 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -61 | -72 | 48.0% | +0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.2 | -0.92 | 1992 | 1515 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.36 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1643 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | -94 | -61 | 44.4% | -0.51 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.80 | 1993 | 1456 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | +24 | 32.1% | -1.04 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +0.31 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1584 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -54 | — | 30.3% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -1.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1832 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -105 | -66 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 36–38 (49%) | 18–14 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.94 | — | 1605 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -18 | +24 | 39.3% | -0.82 | 16–29 (36%) | 10–15 (40%) | 92.1 | +4.76 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Cammy Macgregor
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 10, 1993 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 13, 1991 | H2H |
| Nana Smith | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Gigi Fernandez | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 1990 | H2H |
| Louise Field | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |