Shi-Ting Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Elena Makarova H2H: 1-0
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1996 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | 6-2 6-0 | Elena Makarova | Match data | Aug 15, 1996* | R32 | Manhattan Beach | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | — | #26 | 707 | 1,831 | 129 | 106 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Elena Makarova | — | — | — | 1,755 | 59 | 73 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1995 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 1996 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 23 | 1997 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 72 | 184 | 60.9% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 17 | 29 | 46 | 37.0% | 19 | 26 | 45 | 42.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Elena Makarova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1492 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 1479 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1493 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1605 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 50.9% | +0.09 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1780 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 65.7% | +1.22 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 1776 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -187 | — | 59.7% | +0.78 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.94 | 1993 | 1505 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 38.5% | -0.85 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.16 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1776 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -152 | — | 62.3% | +1.00 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–1 | — | +1.57 | 1994 | 1673 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -29 | — | 50.0% | -0.27 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 103.9 | -0.32 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1805 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -168 | — | 62.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | +1.15 | 1995 | 1750 | 140.3 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -136 | — | 51.5% | +0.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.7 | -1.87 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1682 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -61 | -72 | 48.0% | +0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.2 | -0.92 | 1996 | 1681 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -65 | — | 44.1% | -0.34 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–1 | — | -0.26 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1643 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | -94 | -67 | 44.4% | -0.51 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.80 | 1997 | 1703 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -12 | — | 42.2% | -0.60 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.1 | -0.93 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1584 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -54 | — | 30.3% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -1.23 | 1998 | 1645 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | -5 | -23 | — | 41.9% | -0.55 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–1 | — | -0.76 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1631 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.14 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.79 |
| Career | — | 1832 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -105 | -69 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 36–38 (49%) | 18–14 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.92 | — | 1756 | 136.0 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -49 | — | 46.2% | -0.32 | 17–22 (44%) | 9–12 (43%) | 95.7 | -2.51 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Elena Makarova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Paulus | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 16, 1998 | H2H |
| Larisa Savchenko | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 31, 1999 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 21, 1998 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 23, 1998 | H2H |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jul 19, 1997 | H2H |