H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 0-1
Elena Pampoulova holds a 1–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Pampoulova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Pampoulova won the 1999 Key Biscayne first round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Elena Pampoulova | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |