H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shi-Ting Wang vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Gigi Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1994 US Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gigi Fernandez #48 6-3 6-2 Shi-Ting Wang #34 Match data Sep 4, 1994* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shi-Ting Wang #457 #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0
21 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,804 0 6 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1
23 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,681 0 6 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1
25 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Gigi Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Gigi Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.89 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14
19 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09
20 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64
21 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65
22 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46
23 1997 1682 134.5 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81
24 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -61 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31
25 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.22 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50
Career — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -66 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.94 — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.