H2H data updated: 2026-11-02 00:00 UTC

Shi-Ting Wang vs Helena Sukova H2H: 0-3

Helena Sukova holds a 3–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1997 Wimbledon round of 64 6-0 6-3.

TPE Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Sukova #72 6-0 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #39 Match data Jun 27, 1997* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Helena Sukova #15 6-3 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #72 Match data Nov 14, 1992* SF Indianapolis Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Helena Sukova #17 7-5 6-4 Shi-Ting Wang #181 Match data Feb 1, 1992* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shi-Ting Wang — #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Helena Sukova — #4 735 2,219 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Helena Sukova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0
18 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,908 0 0
19 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,042 0 1
20 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,029 0 1
21 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,152 0 3
22 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,805 0 6 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5
23 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,682 0 6 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,099 0 5
24 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,037 0 6
25 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% — 1,632 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Helena Sukova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8%
18 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
19 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0%
22 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9%
23 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
24 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Helena Sukova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1585 127.9 — — — — — — +53 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1757 137.6 — — — — -65 -78 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.6 -2.70
18 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.90 1983 1908 149.5 — — — — -86 -98 -128 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -1.78
19 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48 1984 2042 155.1 — — — — -97 -323 +11 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.1 -2.57
20 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94 1985 2029 162.5 — — — — -21 -243 +105 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.41
21 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57 1986 2152 173.7 — — — — +12 -258 +28 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.6 -7.09
22 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15 1987 2130 165.0 — — — — +24 -243 +119 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -5.12
23 1997 1682 134.6 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92 1988 2099 164.3 — — — — +36 -123 +88 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.6 -5.08
24 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -67 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +98 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.38
25 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.23 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +47 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1959 153.8 — — — — +56 -27 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -63 +184 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +209 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +296 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1633 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.24
Career — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -69 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.92 — 2219 162.4 — — — — +11 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.