H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-1
Shi-Ting Wang and Judith Wiesner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay, while Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Strasbourg fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1996* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 6-2 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1996* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |