Shi-Ting Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang and Kimberly Po Messerli are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1997 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Po Messerli | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data | Apr 19, 1997* | QF | Japan Women's Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 7-5 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data | Apr 16, 1992* | R32 | Pattaya | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,831 | 129 | 106 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,879 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1995 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 22 | 1996 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1998 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 25 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 112 | 72 | 184 | 60.9% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 72 | 67 | 139 | 51.8% | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 23 | 27 | 50 | 46.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1492 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 1479 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1486 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.12 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1605 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 50.9% | +0.09 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1780 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 65.7% | +1.22 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +0.48 | 1991 | 1568 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 56.5% | -0.26 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | -0.01 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1776 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -187 | — | 59.7% | +0.78 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.94 | 1992 | 1655 | 127.7 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | -30 | 45.6% | -0.40 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.5 | +0.99 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1776 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -152 | — | 62.3% | +1.00 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–1 | — | +1.57 | 1993 | 1777 | 145.0 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -217 | -153 | 50.0% | -0.15 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.5 | -0.91 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1805 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -168 | — | 62.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | +1.15 | 1994 | 1702 | 128.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | -143 | -106 | 44.6% | -0.51 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.08 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1682 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -61 | -72 | 48.0% | +0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.2 | -0.92 | 1995 | 1610 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | +98 | -130 | — | 29.7% | -1.11 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 93.6 | +0.25 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1643 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | -94 | -61 | 44.4% | -0.51 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.80 | 1996 | 1807 | 155.2 | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | -239 | 57.5% | +0.44 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–1 | — | +0.41 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1584 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -54 | — | 30.3% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -1.22 | 1997 | 1790 | 146.8 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -289 | -240 | 55.0% | +0.44 | 9–8 (53%) | 7–2 (78%) | 103.7 | +1.04 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1743 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -267 | -100 | 44.8% | -0.59 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.7 | -0.85 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1653 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -179 | -26 | 38.1% | -1.00 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 93.6 | -1.39 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1611 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.12 |
| Career | — | 1832 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -105 | -66 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 36–38 (49%) | 18–14 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.94 | — | 1880 | 144.9 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -197 | -111 | 47.9% | -0.22 | 33–43 (43%) | 26–20 (57%) | 102.5 | -0.12 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Davenport | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 13, 1998 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 3 | 4 | 7 | Oct 8, 1998 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 27, 1999 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 21, 1998 | H2H |