H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Shi-Ting Wang vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-0

Shi-Ting Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1998 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shi-Ting Wang #63 4-6 6-4 6-1 Lori Mcneil #136 Match data Apr 18, 1998* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shi-Ting Wang #39 6-1 2-6 7-5 Lori Mcneil #125 Match data Jun 25, 1997* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shi-Ting Wang — #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,805 0 6 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,682 0 6 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shi-Ting Wang Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.90 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1997 1682 134.6 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -67 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.23 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -69 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.92 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.