H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-3
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 3–1 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1997 Hobart quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1997* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1994* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-3 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1993* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1988* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-0 6-3 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shi-Ting Wang | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |