Shi-Ting Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1996 Surabaya final 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 6-0 | Nana Smith | Match data | Oct 13, 1996* | F | Surabaya | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Shi-Ting Wang | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Nana Smith | Match data | Apr 30, 1994* | QF | Jakarta | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,831 | 129 | 106 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1990 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 1995 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1997 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 72 | 184 | 60.9% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 52 | 84 | 136 | 38.2% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1492 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 1479 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1496 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1605 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 50.9% | +0.09 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.89 | 1989 | 1588 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | — | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.4 | -0.50 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1780 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 65.7% | +1.22 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +0.48 | 1990 | 1541 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | -2 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 1–5 (17%) | 5–4 (56%) | 96.2 | +1.12 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1776 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -187 | — | 59.7% | +0.78 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.94 | 1991 | 1529 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 37.0% | -0.87 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.61 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1776 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -152 | — | 62.3% | +1.00 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–1 | — | +1.57 | 1992 | 1557 | 108.5 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.32 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.97 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1805 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -168 | — | 62.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | +1.15 | 1993 | 1444 | 90.0 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | — | 14.8% | -2.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.7 | +0.20 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1682 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -61 | -72 | 48.0% | +0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.2 | -0.92 | 1994 | 1579 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | — | — | 55.3% | +0.37 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.70 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1643 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | -94 | -61 | 44.4% | -0.51 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.80 | 1995 | 1545 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | -88 | 40.8% | -0.65 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.5 | +0.66 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1584 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -54 | — | 30.3% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -1.22 | 1996 | 1602 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 47.7% | -0.11 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.0 | +1.18 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1543 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.40 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.08 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1538 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -0.13 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1522 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.86 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.63 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1499 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.03 |
| Career | — | 1832 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -105 | -66 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 36–38 (49%) | 18–14 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.94 | — | 1650 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | -45 | 40.4% | -0.69 | 28–43 (39%) | 20–20 (50%) | 98.5 | +2.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 17, 1998 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 20, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Yone Kamio | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 11, 1996 | H2H |
| Barbara Paulus | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 17, 1995 | H2H |