H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 2-1
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 2–1 lead over Naoko Kijimuta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1997 Tokyo third round 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1996* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-3 6-4 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
| Nov 18, 1995* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Naoko Kijimuta | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Naoko Kijimuta | #538 | #44 | 529 | 1,696 | 37 | 57 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Naoko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #45 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #74 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #279 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |