H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-2
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 2–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1994 Tokyo Nichirei third round 6-0 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1994* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1992* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Naoko Sawamatsu | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |