H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-1
Shi-Ting Wang and Natalia Medvedeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1994 Brisbane quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1992* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Natalia Medvedeva | 6-2 6-4 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |