H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang vs Radomira Zrubakova H2H: 2-0
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Radomira Zrubakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1997 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-3 6-4 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 7-6 6-1 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Radomira Zrubakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |