Shi-Ting Wang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1994 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | 6-4 6-2 | Silke Meier | Match data | May 26, 1994* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,831 | 129 | 106 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,666 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1988 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 18 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1987 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 19 | 1993 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1988 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1994 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1996 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1997 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1998 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 25 | 1999 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 112 | 72 | 184 | 60.9% | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | 19 | 33 | 52 | 36.5% | 47 | 76 | 123 | 38.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 10 | 24 | 34 | 29.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shi-Ting Wang | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1988 | 1492 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1989 | 1479 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1512 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.2% | +0.15 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.25 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1594 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -79 | — | 49.0% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +2.33 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1605 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 50.9% | +0.09 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.7 | +0.89 | 1987 | 1591 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -85 | — | 44.4% | -0.61 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.51 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1780 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 65.7% | +1.22 | 5–2 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.1 | +0.48 | 1988 | 1590 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -66 | +3 | — | 36.5% | -1.14 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.89 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1776 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -187 | — | 59.7% | +0.78 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.0 | +0.94 | 1989 | 1553 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +44 | — | 38.5% | -0.92 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.0 | +1.12 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1776 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -152 | — | 62.3% | +1.00 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–1 | — | +1.57 | 1990 | 1529 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -7 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.9 | -0.10 |
| 22 | 1996 | 1805 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -168 | — | 62.8% | +0.70 | 3–7 (30%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.0 | +1.15 | 1991 | 1511 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +2 | — | 31.3% | -1.13 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.55 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1682 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -61 | -72 | 48.0% | +0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.2 | -0.92 | 1992 | 1585 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -101 | +40 | — | 45.6% | -0.18 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–1 | — | +1.05 |
| 24 | 1998 | 1643 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | -94 | -61 | 44.4% | -0.51 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.80 | 1993 | 1520 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +5 | — | 31.4% | -1.53 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.0 | +0.19 |
| 25 | 1999 | 1584 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +82 | -54 | — | 30.3% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | -1.22 | 1994 | 1528 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +33 | — | 34.5% | -1.14 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.23 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1534 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +42 | — | 42.4% | -0.52 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.7 | +1.06 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1488 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -8 | — | 21.4% | -2.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.31 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| Career | — | 1832 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -105 | -66 | 54.4% | +0.34 | 36–38 (49%) | 18–14 (56%) | 99.8 | +0.94 | — | 1667 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +5 | — | 38.4% | -0.83 | 41–38 (52%) | 15–23 (39%) | 102.4 | +2.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 21, 1999 | H2H |
| Yuka Yoshida | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 4, 1999 | H2H |
| Yayuk Basuki | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1998 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |