Shuai Peng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 5 | 6 | 11 | May 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Oct 18, 2012 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 5 | 5 | 10 | Feb 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jan 8, 2015 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jul 4, 2018 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Shuai Peng vs Jelena Jankovic: 3–7 excluding walkovers; 3–8 including 1 walkover. Across 11 main-draw results including walkovers, Jelena Jankovic leads 5–3 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2012 Luxembourg round of 32 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 3-0 (ret.) | Shuai Peng | Match data | Oct 18, 2012* | R32 | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Shuai Peng | 5-7 7-5 7-6(8) | Jelena Jankovic | Match data | Aug 15, 2012* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jelena Jankovic | (w/o) | Shuai Peng | Match data | Aug 20, 2011* | QF | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Shuai Peng | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data | Jan 21, 2011* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Shuai Peng | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data | Oct 7, 2009* | R32 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jelena Jankovic | 7-5 6-0 | Shuai Peng | Match data | May 8, 2008* | R32 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 6-1 | Shuai Peng | Match data | Aug 9, 2007* | R32 | Los Angeles | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 6-7(3) 2-3 (ret.) | Shuai Peng | Match data | May 11, 2007* | R16 | Berlin Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-4 | Shuai Peng | Match data | Mar 21, 2007* | R64 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-3 | Shuai Peng | Match data | Sep 29, 2006* | R16 | Guangzhou Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-1 | Shuai Peng | Match data | Jun 15, 2006* | R32 | Birmingham | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,907 | 301 | 263 | 53.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,138 | 552 | 337 | 62.1% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shuai Peng | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #28 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #1 | 2,091 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,797 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #84 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2017 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2018 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #125 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,575 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Shuai Peng | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 47.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2006 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 2007 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2008 | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 38 | 18 | 56 | 67.9% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2009 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 49 | 15 | 64 | 76.6% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 25 | 2011 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 68.1% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 27 | 15 | 42 | 64.3% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 29 | 16 | 45 | 64.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 209 | 176 | 385 | 54.3% | 68 | 64 | 132 | 51.5% | 24 | 21 | 45 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 348 | 225 | 573 | 60.7% | 146 | 73 | 219 | 66.7% | 53 | 32 | 85 | 62.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 647/868 of Jelena Jankovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Shuai Peng | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2005 | 5/36 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 61.4% | 60.8% | 37.6% | 50.9% | 53.6% | 53.2% | 54.0% | 2004 | 5/53 | 1.0 | 8.6 | 68.2% | 57.5% | 34.2% | 47.2% | 52.3% | 50.5% | 49.0% |
| 20 | 2006 | 19/35 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 64.1% | 56.9% | 41.5% | 48.6% | 49.0% | 51.0% | 42.0% | 2005 | 9/65 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 65.5% | 66.3% | 40.5% | 58.7% | 57.0% | 57.4% | 45.4% |
| 21 | 2007 | 30/36 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 65.5% | 61.9% | 52.3% | 56.6% | 43.5% | 58.3% | 45.5% | 2006 | 46/73 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 67.7% | 62.7% | 43.4% | 50.1% | 49.7% | 56.6% | 46.1% |
| 22 | 2008 | 34/48 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 68.0% | 60.8% | 48.5% | 49.1% | 48.0% | 56.8% | 47.4% | 2007 | 87/99 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 70.3% | 65.5% | 46.9% | 48.7% | 51.9% | 59.9% | 50.5% |
| 23 | 2009 | 42/45 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 67.7% | 60.9% | 47.4% | 48.7% | 47.7% | 56.5% | 44.5% | 2008 | 69/85 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 69.2% | 65.0% | 46.8% | 57.5% | 56.7% | 59.5% | 49.0% |
| 24 | 2010 | 24/28 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 70.1% | 61.3% | 50.6% | 44.9% | 43.8% | 58.0% | 44.3% | 2009 | 53/61 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 63.7% | 64.2% | 49.0% | 53.7% | 51.3% | 58.7% | 47.8% |
| 25 | 2011 | 65/71 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 66.5% | 48.1% | 53.5% | 47.4% | 60.5% | 45.7% | 2010 | 51/57 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 65.3% | 63.1% | 46.0% | 53.7% | 54.0% | 57.2% | 47.6% |
| 26 | 2012 | 40/45 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 66.8% | 64.1% | 47.3% | 44.4% | 52.1% | 58.4% | 42.4% | 2011 | 53/60 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 63.9% | 66.8% | 47.8% | 50.7% | 48.4% | 60.0% | 48.6% |
| 27 | 2013 | 35/36 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 65.1% | 62.3% | 44.6% | 52.6% | 47.6% | 55.9% | 44.7% | 2012 | 53/59 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 60.5% | 63.6% | 43.8% | 55.9% | 48.2% | 56.1% | 46.5% |
| 28 | 2014 | 43/50 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 63.3% | 64.2% | 46.5% | 53.4% | 53.6% | 57.5% | 42.3% | 2013 | 62/67 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 62.0% | 63.7% | 46.5% | 55.7% | 50.7% | 57.1% | 47.3% |
| 29 | 2015 | 13/13 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 63.2% | 59.9% | 44.5% | 44.8% | 38.1% | 54.2% | 41.2% | 2014 | 56/60 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 49.0% | 57.1% | 50.7% | 59.7% | 47.0% |
| 30 | 2016 | 14/21 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 61.4% | 60.2% | 45.4% | 54.0% | 45.8% | 54.7% | 36.8% | 2015 | 41/60 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 63.4% | 64.1% | 52.6% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 59.9% | 41.6% |
| 31 | 2017 | 57/58 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 63.7% | 63.7% | 47.7% | 55.3% | 49.4% | 57.8% | 47.0% | 2016 | 37/44 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 62.2% | 65.3% | 45.6% | 58.3% | 52.0% | 57.9% | 47.4% |
| 32 | 2018 | 9/10 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 63.8% | 60.8% | 46.5% | 57.7% | 47.4% | 56.2% | 33.5% | 2017 | 25/25 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 60.6% | 61.5% | 42.6% | 54.0% | 57.1% | 54.2% | 39.9% |
| 33 | 2019 | 16/16 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 67.6% | 62.3% | 44.1% | 51.6% | 41.3% | 56.1% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 71.8% | 63.2% | 52.9% | 53.4% | 56.9% | 60.0% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 451/566 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 66.0% | 62.7% | 47.2% | 51.4% | 48.0% | 57.3% | 44.3% | — | 647/889 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 65.0% | 64.5% | 46.7% | 53.9% | 51.5% | 58.3% | 47.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Shuai Peng | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2001 | 1494 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2002 | 1485 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.02 | 2001 | 1512 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | 2003 | 1455 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | +0.22 | 2002 | 1529 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.79 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 |
| 18 | 2004 | 1516 | 114.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.60 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.25 | 2003 | 1488 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -9 | — | 39.3% | -0.36 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–2 | — | +0.62 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1680 | 142.9 | -0.36 | +4.21 | 1.154 | 53.6% | -27 | -58 | — | 56.8% | +0.53 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.0 | +0.12 | 2004 | 1746 | 139.9 | -1.12 | +2.19 | 0.989 | 49.7% | -43 | -137 | -129 | 53.7% | +0.12 | 8–11 (42%) | 11–2 (85%) | 107.5 | -0.93 |
| 20 | 2006 | 1729 | 119.5 | -2.95 | -1.68 | 0.858 | 46.7% | -74 | -31 | -96 | 53.5% | -0.15 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.6 | -0.81 | 2005 | 1733 | 142.6 | +1.39 | +0.98 | 1.067 | 51.2% | -36 | -21 | -3 | 56.8% | +0.58 | 9–15 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 91.2 | -0.92 |
| 21 | 2007 | 1738 | 140.7 | +2.26 | +2.00 | 1.092 | 51.8% | -34 | +14 | — | 53.2% | +0.52 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.4 | -0.16 | 2006 | 1925 | 155.2 | +0.93 | +2.16 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -25 | -178 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.98 | 16–10 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | 105.8 | -1.57 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1707 | 128.9 | +0.94 | +2.05 | 1.097 | 52.0% | -3 | -20 | -79 | 53.3% | +0.38 | 4–11 (27%) | 7–3 (70%) | 97.0 | +1.57 | 2007 | 1977 | 166.7 | +4.61 | +7.29 | 1.259 | 54.9% | -66 | +125 | -9 | 71.8% | +1.76 | 15–14 (52%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.5 | -2.33 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1773 | 142.5 | +1.21 | +1.78 | 1.022 | 50.6% | +16 | -138 | — | 52.0% | +0.22 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.4 | -1.70 | 2008 | 2091 | 167.1 | +4.57 | +5.72 | 1.211 | 54.2% | 0 | +6 | -122 | 72.3% | +1.59 | 14–12 (54%) | 9–6 (60%) | 97.6 | -0.03 |
| 24 | 2010 | 1760 | 128.8 | +1.83 | +0.38 | 1.056 | 51.1% | +2 | -76 | — | 51.6% | +0.14 | 7–7 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.6 | -1.67 | 2009 | 1953 | 153.9 | +3.33 | +4.18 | 1.158 | 53.2% | +35 | +106 | -56 | 65.7% | +0.99 | 10–10 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | 96.3 | +1.47 |
| 25 | 2011 | 1840 | 146.6 | +4.59 | +2.04 | 1.157 | 53.1% | +11 | -74 | -116 | 64.2% | +1.13 | 18–8 (69%) | 7–9 (44%) | 105.6 | +1.38 | 2010 | 1797 | 148.2 | +1.63 | +4.10 | 1.111 | 52.3% | -26 | +268 | +127 | 59.5% | +0.69 | 11–5 (69%) | 6–6 (50%) | 98.9 | +1.90 |
| 26 | 2012 | 1708 | 129.2 | +1.71 | -0.73 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +13 | +6 | +50 | 52.0% | +0.11 | 8–8 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.7 | +1.22 | 2011 | 1795 | 152.5 | +3.98 | +4.60 | 1.215 | 54.2% | -5 | +179 | — | 63.5% | +1.32 | 6–15 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | 89.2 | +2.37 |
| 27 | 2013 | 1656 | 128.2 | +0.33 | +0.95 | 1.015 | 50.5% | -3 | +77 | — | 50.6% | +0.07 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–3 (50%) | 99.6 | -0.24 | 2012 | 1733 | 140.2 | +0.76 | +2.74 | 1.061 | 51.2% | +44 | +108 | +82 | 51.6% | +0.25 | 6–10 (38%) | 8–11 (42%) | 90.7 | -0.18 |
| 28 | 2014 | 1747 | 135.0 | +1.13 | -0.79 | 0.996 | 50.1% | -12 | -53 | +25 | 57.1% | +0.46 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.7 | +0.27 | 2013 | 1921 | 155.5 | +1.91 | +3.65 | 1.103 | 52.2% | -10 | +25 | — | 63.4% | +0.98 | 17–10 (63%) | 12–6 (67%) | 108.0 | +2.23 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1701 | 126.5 | -2.49 | +0.54 | 0.900 | 47.6% | +36 | — | — | 53.6% | -0.04 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.02 | 2014 | 1797 | 152.0 | +3.44 | +3.23 | 1.165 | 53.1% | +32 | +152 | — | 63.1% | +1.09 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–9 (36%) | 91.3 | +1.30 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1660 | 114.8 | +0.32 | -3.37 | 0.812 | 46.4% | +54 | — | +28 | 41.5% | -0.78 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.6 | +0.09 | 2015 | 1858 | 140.4 | +1.72 | +0.71 | 1.039 | 50.5% | +8 | +11 | -27 | 61.7% | +0.75 | 15–6 (71%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.52 |
| 31 | 2017 | 1794 | 144.9 | +1.43 | +3.25 | 1.114 | 52.3% | +9 | -153 | -47 | 59.8% | +0.67 | 9–7 (56%) | 9–6 (60%) | 102.1 | -1.14 | 2016 | 1730 | 132.2 | +1.48 | +2.78 | 1.125 | 52.4% | +42 | +35 | +71 | 56.0% | +0.52 | 4–12 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 86.5 | +1.30 |
| 32 | 2018 | 1724 | 109.2 | -0.92 | -4.14 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +31 | -67 | — | 21.7% | -1.91 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | -0.14 | 2017 | 1575 | 121.7 | -1.62 | -1.81 | 0.871 | 47.5% | +83 | +113 | +164 | 34.4% | -0.87 | 2–9 (18%) | 1–4 (20%) | 88.8 | -0.72 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1670 | 122.1 | -0.89 | +0.34 | 0.993 | 49.8% | +20 | — | — | 51.4% | -0.34 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 97.5 | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 1627 | 111.9 | +1.00 | -0.04 | 1.097 | 52.2% | +20 | — | — | 41.7% | 0.00 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1908 | 141.0 | +1.33 | +0.93 | 1.037 | 50.8% | +2 | -48 | -41 | 53.9% | +0.30 | 86–94 (48%) | 60–55 (52%) | 98.4 | -0.11 | — | 2139 | 156.2 | +2.59 | +3.80 | 1.133 | 52.7% | -3 | +72 | -8 | 61.1% | +0.87 | 142–153 (48%) | 101–88 (53%) | 93.6 | +0.58 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 5 | 6 | 11 | May 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Oct 18, 2012 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 5 | 5 | 10 | Feb 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jan 8, 2015 | H2H |
| Samantha Stosur | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jul 4, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 7 | 7 | 14 | Mar 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 4 | 10 | 14 | Aug 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 13 | 1 | 14 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 6 | 8 | 14 | Feb 26, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 22, 2017 | H2H |