H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Jill Craybas H2H: 4-0

Shuai Peng holds a 4–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2011 Pan Pacific Open round of 64 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #15 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #119 Match data Sep 28, 2011* R64 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shuai Peng #40 6-4 6-1 Jill Craybas #78 Match data Sep 20, 2008* QF Guangzhou Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #68 7-6(4) 5-7 6-0 Jill Craybas #66 Match data May 7, 2008* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Shuai Peng #108 6-3 6-3 Jill Craybas #62 Match data Aug 19, 2004* R32 Cincinnati Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.