H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-1

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 3-6 7-6(4) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Lindsay Davenport #1 3-6 7-6(4) 6-0 Shuai Peng #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —