H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 2-4

Lucie Safarova holds a 4–2 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2017 Taipei semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #71 6-4 6-2 Lucie Safarova #55 Match data Feb 4, 2017* SF Taipei International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #39 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #15 Match data Sep 2, 2014* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lucie Safarova #28 6-2 5-7 6-4 Shuai Peng #44 Match data Feb 13, 2014* R32 Qatar Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lucie Safarova #28 7-5 6-4 Shuai Peng #45 Match data Oct 17, 2013* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Safarova #43 6-3 4-6 6-4 Shuai Peng #53 Match data Sep 30, 2009* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Lucie Safarova #82 6-4 6-2 Shuai Peng #53 Match data Aug 24, 2008* F Forest Hills Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng — #14 2,825 1,908 301 264 53.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lucie Safarova — #5 4,055 1,931 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,780 0 3
21 2007 19–18 51.4% #45 1,733 0 0 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,706 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,793 0 5
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,699 0 7
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Lucie Safarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 177 386 54.1% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/554 of Shuai Peng's and 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Lucie Safarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7%
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7%
21 2007 30/37 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7%
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0%
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0%
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7%
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7%
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8%
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4%
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 451/567 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.3% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Lucie Safarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2007 1780 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -66 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.98
21 2007 1733 140.4 +2.14 +2.01 1.092 51.8% -35 +19 — 52.4% +0.41 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.5 -0.20 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17
22 2008 1706 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -5 -19 -78 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.61 2009 1773 144.0 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +19 -74 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32
23 2009 1774 142.7 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +15 -139 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -108 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.45
24 2010 1761 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +1 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 -1.67 2011 1800 143.3 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +14 -5 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.95
25 2011 1841 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -75 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2012 1750 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +127 -150 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27
26 2012 1708 129.3 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +14 +7 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.21 2013 1793 132.0 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73
27 2013 1656 128.3 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2014 1861 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -26 -11 -145 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02
28 2014 1747 135.1 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2015 1831 150.8 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -24 +70 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85
29 2015 1702 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +35 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2016 1699 127.6 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +209 +26 47.9% -0.01 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56
30 2016 1661 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +53 — +27 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 2017 1798 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +17 +46 -1 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.87
31 2017 1795 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -154 -48 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.32 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +1 -48 -42 53.9% +0.30 86–95 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1931 145.8 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.