H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 2-4

Lucie Safarova holds a 4–2 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2017 Taipei semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 4, 2017* Taipei WTA 250 SF Hard Shuai Peng #71 6-4 6-2 Lucie Safarova #55 Match data
Sep 2, 2014* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Shuai Peng #39 6-3 6-4 Lucie Safarova #15 Match data
Feb 13, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #28 6-2 5-7 6-4 Shuai Peng #44 Match data
Oct 17, 2013* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #28 7-5 6-4 Shuai Peng #45 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #43 6-3 4-6 6-4 Shuai Peng #53 Match data
Aug 24, 2008* Forest Hills WTA 250 F Hard Lucie Safarova #82 6-4 6-2 Shuai Peng #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —