H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Marissa Irvin H2H: 1-0

Shuai Peng holds a 1–0 lead over Marissa Irvin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2005 Charleston Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Marissa Irvin
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #48 6-2 6-4 Marissa Irvin #73 Match data Apr 13, 2005* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marissa Irvin #854 #51 652 1,603 37 80 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Marissa Irvin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #412 1,495 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #131 1,487 0 0
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2000 4–7 36.4% #88 1,505 0 0
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 2001 8–14 36.4% #64 1,571 0 0
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 2002 9–18 33.3% #77 1,572 0 0
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2003 3–11 21.4% #141 1,502 0 0
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2004 7–13 35.0% #72 1,499 0 0
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2005 6–14 30.0% #128 1,505 0 0
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Marissa Irvin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 8 11 19 42.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 8 9 11.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 26 52 78 33.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Marissa Irvin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 1998 1496 101.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.04
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 1999 1487 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.30
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2000 1505 117.5 — — — — +18 — — 39.3% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 0.00
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 2001 1572 122.9 — — — — -1 -33 — 38.9% -0.74 5–5 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 -1.30
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 2002 1572 129.6 — — — — +40 -62 — 37.1% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 -1.41
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2003 1503 104.4 — — — — +12 +35 — 30.3% -1.57 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.46
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 2004 1500 126.9 — — — — -10 +82 — 38.6% -0.23 1–5 (17%) 3–8 (27%) 93.1 +0.59
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2005 1506 112.6 — — — — -46 +67 — 36.2% -1.38 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 100.0 -0.56
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 1604 125.7 — — — — +5 +17 — 36.4% -0.97 15–30 (33%) 16–17 (48%) 97.1 -2.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.