H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-2

Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 San Diego semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 6, 2005* San Diego WTA 1000 SF Hard Mary Pierce #14 6-2 6-2 Shuai Peng #46 Match data
May 11, 2005* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Mary Pierce #24 6-1 7-5 Shuai Peng #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 — — — — — — —