H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0

Shuai Peng holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2009 Los Angeles round of 64 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #38 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 Michaella Krajicek #121 Match data Aug 5, 2009* R64 Los Angeles Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Michaella Krajicek #1,134 #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,670 0 3
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,536 0 3
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,536 0 3
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,506 0 3
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,589 0 3
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,562 0 3
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,545 0 3
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 50.9% 45.4% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 2007 1671 133.9 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -36 +109 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.19
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 2008 1536 99.3 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +17 -23 +207 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 +0.74
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2009 1536 114.7 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +22 — +168 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.19
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 2010 1507 96.3 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +30 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 2011 1589 120.2 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +35 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +1.00
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2012 1562 112.0 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +61 -54 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.19
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 2013 1536 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +55 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.28
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 2015 1549 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2017 1529 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1502 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 1803 124.4 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -84 +80 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.