H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 1-2

Sybille Bammer holds a 2–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2008 Wimbledon second round 7-6(7) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #54 7-6(7) 4-6 6-3 Sybille Bammer #29 Match data Jun 26, 2008* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Sybille Bammer #46 6-3 6-3 Shuai Peng #42 Match data Mar 8, 2007* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Sybille Bammer #61 6-4 6-2 Shuai Peng #42 Match data Feb 10, 2007* SF Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng — #14 2,825 1,908 301 264 53.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sybille Bammer — #19 2,014 1,845 133 141 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2007 19–18 51.4% #45 1,733 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,706 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2007 43–25 63.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,649 0 2
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,570 0 2
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 29 17 46 63.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 209 177 386 54.1% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 94 98 192 49.0% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/554 of Shuai Peng's and 198/267 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 30/37 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% 2007 56/68 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 451/567 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.3% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 198/274 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
21 2007 1733 140.4 +2.14 +2.01 1.092 51.8% -35 +19 — 52.4% +0.41 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.5 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1706 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -5 -19 -78 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1774 142.7 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +15 -139 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17
24 2010 1761 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +1 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 -1.67 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03
25 2011 1841 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -75 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2012 1708 129.3 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +14 +7 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.21 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2013 1656 128.3 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2007 1780 148.4 +3.79 +3.03 1.182 53.4% -40 -62 -94 62.9% +0.93 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.08
28 2014 1747 135.1 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.7 +4.05
29 2015 1702 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +35 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2009 1672 130.5 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -61 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.50
30 2016 1661 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +53 — +27 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 2010 1649 124.4 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -15 -62 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 2017 1795 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -154 -48 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 2011 1571 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +73 +17 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.32 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +1 -48 -42 53.9% +0.30 86–95 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1845 135.5 +0.08 +0.68 0.994 49.8% 0 -21 -53 49.8% -0.09 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.2 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.