H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Indian Wells fourth round 3-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Venus Williams #13 3-6 6-1 6-3 Shuai Peng #49 Match data
Oct 3, 2016 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shuai Peng #223 7-5 5-1 Venus Williams #13 Match data
Mar 7, 2008* Bangalore WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #7 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 Shuai Peng #58 Match data
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #9 6-3 6-1 Shuai Peng #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47