H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shuai Peng vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-4

Yanina Wickmayer holds a 4–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2017 Guangzhou Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yanina Wickmayer #116 6-4 6-4 Shuai Peng #24 Match data Sep 21, 2017* R16 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shuai Peng #49 7-5 7-5 Yanina Wickmayer #25 Match data Oct 3, 2012* R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Yanina Wickmayer #23 3-6 7-6(3) 7-5 Shuai Peng #72 Match data Jan 8, 2011* SF ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Yanina Wickmayer #50 2-6 6-1 6-4 Shuai Peng #44 Match data Sep 3, 2009* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Yanina Wickmayer #163 6-0 6-4 Shuai Peng #59 Match data Feb 14, 2008* R32 Antwerp Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shuai Peng Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0
19 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2
20 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3
21 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3
22 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3
23 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3
24 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5
27 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5
28 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5
29 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5
30 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5
31 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5
33 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5
34 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shuai Peng Yanina Wickmayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 451/553 of Shuai Peng's and 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shuai Peng Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4%
19 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0% 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6%
20 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0% 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2%
21 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5% 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5%
22 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4% 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5% 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3% 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2%
25 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7% 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2%
26 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4% 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9%
27 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8%
28 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3% 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4%
29 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2% 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3%
30 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8% 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2%
31 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5% 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4%
33 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6% 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3%
34 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9% 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6%
Career — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3% — 396/440 2.6 4.0 63.9% 63.3% 45.2% 50.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shuai Peng Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19
19 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38
20 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09
21 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40
22 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14
23 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49
24 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61
25 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93
26 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27
27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90
28 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44
29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07
30 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
31 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10
33 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31
34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17
Career — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11 — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.