H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silke Meier vs Carrie Cunningham H2H: 0-1
Carrie Cunningham holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carrie Cunningham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carrie Cunningham won the 1989 Brisbane second round 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1989* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Carrie Cunningham | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Silke Meier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carrie Cunningham | #801 | #38 | 25 | 1,738 | 54 | 74 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silke Meier | Carrie Cunningham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #137 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #70 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #249 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #634 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |