H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Silke Meier vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 1-0
Silke Meier holds a 1–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silke Meier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silke Meier won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 0-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Silke Meier | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silke Meier | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |