H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Silke Meier vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-3

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 3–1 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 US Open first round 6-0 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silke Meier
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-0 2-6 6-2 Silke Meier #105 Match data
May 18, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 R32 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-0 6-4 Silke Meier #108 Match data
May 12, 1994* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Silke Meier #158 6-4 4-6 6-2 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data
May 28, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 4-6 6-4 6-3 Silke Meier #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silke Meier #948 #40 101 1,667 81 141 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silke Meier Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 3–3 50.0% #164 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 10–10 50.0% #85 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 10–13 43.5% #50 1,592 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1988 8–16 33.3% #99 1,590 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1989 7–14 33.3% #148 1,555 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1990 6–13 31.6% #132 1,529 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1991 4–9 30.8% #138 1,511 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1992 10–13 43.5% #80 1,586 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1993 6–16 27.3% #151 1,520 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1994 5–9 35.7% #113 1,528 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1995 10–14 41.7% #91 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 2–10 16.7% #205 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1997 0–1 0.0% #234 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8