Silke Meier
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Silke Meier vs Min Tang H2H: 1-0
Silke Meier holds a 1–0 lead over Min Tang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silke Meier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silke Meier won the 1996 Australian Open round of 128 0-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | 0-6 6-4 6-2 | Min Tang | Match data | Jan 17, 1996* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,666 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Min Tang | #747 | #112 | 13 | 1,565 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silke Meier | Min Tang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Silke Meier | Min Tang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1995 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1996 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 33 | 52 | 36.5% | 47 | 76 | 123 | 38.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 10 | 24 | 34 | 29.4% | — | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Silke Meier | Min Tang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1512 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.2% | +0.15 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 1594 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -79 | — | 49.0% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +2.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 1591 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +67 | -85 | — | 44.4% | -0.61 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1590 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -66 | +3 | — | 36.5% | -1.14 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1553 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +44 | — | 38.5% | -0.92 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.0 | +1.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 1529 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -7 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.9 | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 1511 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +2 | — | 31.3% | -1.13 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 1585 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -101 | +40 | — | 45.6% | -0.18 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–1 | — | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 1520 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +5 | — | 31.4% | -1.53 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.0 | +0.19 | 1995 | 1534 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | +54 | — | — | 47.1% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.5 | -0.18 |
| 25 | 1994 | 1528 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +33 | — | 34.5% | -1.14 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.23 | 1996 | 1506 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1534 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +42 | — | 42.4% | -0.52 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.7 | +1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 1488 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -8 | — | 21.4% | -2.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1667 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +5 | — | 38.4% | -0.83 | 41–38 (52%) | 15–23 (39%) | 102.4 | +2.64 | — | 1565 | 111.9 | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.64 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.2 | -1.94 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Min Tang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yone Kamio | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Jing-Qian Yi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 18, 1995 | H2H |