H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silke Meier vs Neige Dias H2H: 1-1
Silke Meier and Neige Dias are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on clay, while Silke Meier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1989 Barcelona third round 6-7 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1989* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Neige Dias | 6-7 6-3 6-1 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Silke Meier | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Neige Dias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neige Dias | — | — | — | 1,748 | 75 | 75 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silke Meier | Neige Dias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–19 | 50.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |