H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silke Meier vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-4

Sandra Cecchini holds a 4–1 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Silke Meier won the 1995 Zagreb fourth round 6-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silke Meier
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 28, 1995* Zagreb WTA 250 R16 Clay Silke Meier #124 6-7 6-4 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #31 Match data
Sep 22, 1994* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Carpet Sandra Cecchini #47 6-1 6-1 Silke Meier #99 Match data
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sandra Cecchini #45 6-3 6-1 Silke Meier #94 Match data
Jul 10, 1992* Kitzbuhel WTA 250 R16 Clay Sandra Cecchini #41 6-3 7-5 Silke Meier #117 Match data
May 15, 1991* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sandra Cecchini #19 6-2 6-0 Silke Meier #168 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silke Meier #948 #40 101 1,667 81 141 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silke Meier Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 3–3 50.0% #164 1,512 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1986 10–10 50.0% #85 1,594 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1987 10–13 43.5% #50 1,592 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1988 8–16 33.3% #99 1,590 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1989 7–14 33.3% #148 1,555 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1990 6–13 31.6% #132 1,529 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1991 4–9 30.8% #138 1,511 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1992 10–13 43.5% #80 1,586 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1993 6–16 27.3% #151 1,520 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1994 5–9 35.7% #113 1,528 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1995 10–14 41.7% #91 1,534 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1996 2–10 16.7% #205 1,488 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1997 0–1 0.0% #234 1,482 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11