H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-4

Amanda Coetzer holds a 4–2 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2003 Filderstadt third round 7-6(4) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2003* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #22 7-6(4) 7-6(4) Amanda Coetzer #23 Match data
Oct 17, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amanda Coetzer #20 7-5 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #14 Match data
Apr 2, 1998* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #4 6-4 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #28 Match data
Mar 23, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #31 6-7 6-2 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #5 Match data
Oct 24, 1997* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Carpet Amanda Coetzer #5 6-2 3-6 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #54 Match data
May 6, 1992* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Amanda Coetzer #31 6-1 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —