H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Anke Huber H2H: 3-5

Anke Huber holds a 5–3 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Anke Huber leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2001 Zurich third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 18, 2001* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #15 6-2 6-4 Anke Huber #19 Match data
May 27, 2001* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay Silvia Farina Elia #28 7-5 0-6 6-4 Anke Huber #21 Match data
Mar 12, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #38 6-3 4-6 6-4 Anke Huber #15 Match data
Feb 17, 2001* Nice WTA 500 QF Carpet Anke Huber #16 6-2 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #49 Match data
Nov 5, 1998* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anke Huber #20 6-4 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #19 Match data
Aug 27, 1998* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Anke Huber #21 6-2 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #22 Match data
Sep 25, 1997* Leipzig WTA 250 R32 Carpet Anke Huber #7 6-4 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #47 Match data
Oct 19, 1996* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Anke Huber #4 6-1 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —