H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-2

Ann Grossman holds a 2–1 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1996 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ann Grossman #72 6-4 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #42 Match data Aug 28, 1996* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Silvia Farina Elia #48 7-6 6-0 Ann Grossman #65 Match data Aug 14, 1996* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Ann Grossman #40 6-2 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #68 Match data Jun 22, 1994* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 369 312 54.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,586 0 0 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,679 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,649 0 0 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1996 23–22 51.1% #34 1,711 0 0 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,719 0 0 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,783 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2000 17–18 48.6% #63 1,709 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 42–24 63.6% #20 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,642 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1990 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1992 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1993 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1996 11 10 21 52.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1998 13 11 24 54.2% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1999 8 10 18 44.4% 12 9 21 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 5 7 12 41.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 22 11 33 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 15 12 27 55.6% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 7 14 21 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 10 12 22 45.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 129 258 50.0% 157 110 267 58.8% 29 27 56 51.8% 54 46 100 54.0% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1989 1523 107.1 — — — — — +47 — 46.7% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.49 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1990 1528 110.3 — — — — — +28 — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.17 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1991 1590 119.1 — — — — -52 +52 — 46.3% -0.46 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — +0.60 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1992 1578 112.3 — — — — -16 +43 — 33.3% -1.39 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.1 -0.40 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1993 1587 115.3 — — — — -13 -10 +21 44.2% -0.48 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 -0.63 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1994 1679 127.7 — — — — -57 -10 -47 46.6% -0.03 9–5 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 103.2 +0.22 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1995 1650 125.3 — — — — -53 +47 -19 52.1% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 2–10 (17%) 92.8 +0.84 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1996 1712 137.8 — — — — -18 +33 — 52.0% 0.00 7–5 (58%) 7–2 (78%) 105.7 -0.02 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1997 1720 140.6 — — — — -7 +28 -87 45.2% -0.34 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 -1.88 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1998 1901 156.1 — — — — -35 -31 — 54.9% +0.30 14–6 (70%) 5–5 (50%) 107.1 -5.73 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1999 1784 146.6 — — — — +15 +17 -174 57.7% +0.55 6–11 (35%) 4–4 (50%) 90.7 -2.27 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 2000 1710 130.6 — — — — +9 +70 — 47.5% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 98.3 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1768 141.2 — — — — +7 +61 -115 58.6% +0.43 19–7 (73%) 5–8 (38%) 105.4 +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1746 143.3 — — — — +13 +78 -56 57.4% +0.56 12–7 (63%) 6–11 (35%) 97.8 +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1719 134.0 +2.40 +1.09 1.150 52.8% -95 +122 +158 53.4% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 97.6 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1770 142.3 +0.56 +2.59 1.099 52.2% -28 +126 +91 58.4% +0.63 16–8 (67%) 8–7 (53%) 107.1 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1643 133.1 -0.21 +3.99 1.156 53.4% -13 +219 +164 53.1% +0.30 3–7 (30%) 4–2 (67%) 95.9 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1944 143.6 +0.84 +2.64 1.135 52.8% -19 +57 +10 53.0% +0.21 122–91 (57%) 60–72 (45%) 100.6 -1.05 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.