H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 3-1
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 3–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 1999 Prostejov third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1999* | Prostejov | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1998* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 6-3 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1998* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-3 6-2 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Silvia Farina Elia | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |