H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–2 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2003 Wimbledon third round 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 29, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Silvia Farina Elia #25 7-6(6) 6-3 Chanda Rubin #8 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Chanda Rubin #37 6-1 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #12 Match data
Jan 9, 1999* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Silvia Farina Elia #19 6-3 4-6 7-5 Chanda Rubin #35 Match data
Jan 15, 1994* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Chanda Rubin #66 6-2 5-7 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #87 Match data
Aug 28, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Chanda Rubin #157 6-4 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —