H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-7

Conchita Martínez holds a 7–2 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 4–1 on clay and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2003 Eastbourne semifinal 6-2 6-4.

ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 7
9 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2003* Eastbourne WTA 500 SF Grass Conchita Martínez #19 6-2 6-4 Silvia Farina Elia #28 Match data
Apr 12, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #32 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #7 Match data
Feb 16, 2001* Nice WTA 500 R16 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #49 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Conchita Martínez #5 6-1 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #51 Match data
May 5, 1999* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #18 6-4 6-1 Silvia Farina Elia #25 Match data
Jul 19, 1998* Warsaw WTA 250 F Clay Conchita Martínez #7 6-0 6-3 Silvia Farina Elia #26 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Conchita Martínez #7 6-1 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #27 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Conchita Martínez #2 6-0 6-0 Silvia Farina Elia #42 Match data
Apr 5, 1996* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #2 6-1 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33