H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 4-3

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 4–3 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 2–1 on clay, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2005 Gold Coast fourth round 5-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia
ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 7, 2005* Gold Coast WTA 500 R16 Hard Silvia Farina Elia #20 5-7 6-1 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #54 Match data
Oct 1, 2004* Hasselt WTA 250 R16 Hard Denisa Chladkova #62 6-0 6-2 Silvia Farina Elia #22 Match data
Apr 29, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 R32 Clay Silvia Farina Elia #16 6-4 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #52 Match data
Aug 9, 2002* Helsinki WTA 250 R16 Clay Denisa Chladkova #102 7-5 7-6(3) Silvia Farina Elia #14 Match data
May 10, 2001* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Denisa Chladkova #54 6-2 1-0 (ret.) Silvia Farina Elia #29 Match data
Feb 12, 1999* Prostejov WTA 250 R16 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #21 6-2 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #129 Match data
Feb 12, 1998* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Silvia Farina Elia #40 2-6 6-2 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Silvia Farina Elia #32 #11 1,838 1,943 365 309 54.2% 0 0 0 3 0 3
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Silvia Farina Elia Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1989 3–3 50.0% #172 1,522 0 0 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 1990 2–3 40.0% #194 1,527 0 0 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0
19 1991 9–9 50.0% #69 1,590 0 0 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0
20 1992 5–10 33.3% #172 1,578 0 0 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0
21 1993 9–12 42.9% #85 1,587 0 0 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0
22 1994 20–19 51.3% #52 1,678 0 0 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0
23 1995 18–16 52.9% #52 1,650 0 0 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0
24 1996 22–21 51.2% #34 1,711 0 0 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0
25 1997 16–22 42.1% #43 1,720 0 0 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0
26 1998 38–26 59.4% #19 1,901 0 0 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 1999 30–26 53.6% #26 1,782 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2000 15–17 46.9% #63 1,695 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 45–26 63.4% #14 1,768 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–28 60.0% #17 1,745 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2003 25–25 50.0% #24 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2004 41–23 64.1% #20 1,770 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2005 25–23 52.1% #32 1,648 0 3 — — — — — — —