H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Silvia Farina Elia vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 2-1

Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 1995 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Silvia Farina Elia

ITA Age 54 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H

2 – 1

3 main-draw meetings

Emanuela Zardo

SUI Age 56 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Silvia Farina Elia #51	6-4 6-4	Emanuela Zardo #148	Match data	Mar 18, 1995*	R128	Key Biscayne	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Silvia Farina Elia #52	6-3 6-3	Emanuela Zardo #141	Match data	Feb 2, 1995*	R32	ASB Classic	Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard
Emanuela Zardo #59	6-2 6-4	Silvia Farina Elia #83	Match data	Mar 31, 1994*	R32	Hilton Head	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Silvia Farina Elia	#32	#11	1,838	1,943	369	312	54.2%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Emanuela Zardo	#976	#27	80	1,756	69	75	47.9%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Silvia Farina Elia							Emanuela Zardo
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1989	3–3	50.0%	#172	1,522	0	0	1987	0–1	0.0%	#258	1,488	0	0
18	1990	2–3	40.0%	#194	1,527	0	0	1988	0–1	0.0%	#283	1,476	0	0
19	1991	9–9	50.0%	#69	1,590	0	0	1989	0–3	0.0%	#142	1,449	0	0
20	1992	5–10	33.3%	#172	1,578	0	0	1990	13–12	52.0%	#63	1,593	0	0
21	1993	9–12	42.9%	#85	1,586	0	0	1991	17–11	60.7%	#31	1,714	0	1
22	1994	20–19	51.3%	#52	1,679	0	0	1992	18–15	54.5%	#39	1,740	0	1
23	1995	18–16	52.9%	#52	1,649	0	0	1993	12–16	42.9%	#73	1,650	0	1
24	1996	23–22	51.1%	#34	1,711	0	0	1994	9–13	40.9%	#89	1,574	0	1
25	1997	16–22	42.1%	#43	1,719	0	0	1995	0–3	0.0%	#181	1,542	0	1
26	1998	38–26	59.4%	#19	1,901	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1999	30–26	53.6%	#26	1,783	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2000	17–18	48.6%	#63	1,709	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2001	45–26	63.4%	#14	1,768	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2002	42–28	60.0%	#17	1,745	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2003	25–25	50.0%	#24	1,719	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2004	42–24	63.6%	#20	1,769	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2005	25–23	52.1%	#32	1,642	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Silvia Farina Elia																	Emanuela Zardo
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1989	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1990	—	—	—	—	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1991	1	2	3	33.3%	8	7	15	53.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
20	1992	2	2	4	50.0%	3	7	10	30.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1990	3	4	7	42.9%	9	7	16	56.3%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
21	1993	2	2	4	50.0%	4	7	11	36.4%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1991	1	4	5	20.0%	15	5	20	75.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
22	1994	6	7	13	46.2%	8	8	16	50.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1992	2	4	6	33.3%	15	9	24	62.5%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%
23	1995	7	7	14	50.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1993	3	5	8	37.5%	7	7	14	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%
24	1996	11	10	21	52.4%	10	7	17	58.8%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	1994	6	5	11	54.5%	3	6	9	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
25	1997	5	9	14	35.7%	6	4	10	60.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	1995	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1998	13	11	24	54.2%	15	7	22	68.2%	0	1	1	0.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1999	8	10	18	44.4%	12	9	21	57.1%	1	2	3	33.3%	9	5	14	64.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2000	5	7	12	41.7%	9	6	15	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2001	12	9	21	57.1%	22	11	33	66.7%	4	2	6	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2002	15	12	27	55.6%	14	8	22	63.6%	3	2	5	60.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2003	7	14	21	33.3%	9	5	14	64.3%	7	2	9	77.8%	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2004	25	15	40	62.5%	12	5	17	70.6%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2005	10	12	22	45.5%	11	7	18	61.1%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	129	129	258	50.0%	157	110	267	58.8%	29	27	56	51.8%	54	46	100	54.0%	—	15	25	40	37.5%	49	38	87	56.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	4	9	13	30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Silvia Farina Elia																Emanuela Zardo
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1989	1523	107.1	—	—	—	—	—	+47	—	46.7%	-0.47	2–1 (67%)	1–0	—	+0.49	1987	1488	96.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	-0.01
18	1990	1528	110.3	—	—	—	—	—	+28	—	45.5%	+0.09	0–1	—	—	-0.17	1988	1477	101.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.00	0–1	—	—	+0.05
19	1991	1590	119.1	—	—	—	—	-52	+52	—	46.3%	-0.46	4–1 (80%)	1–1	—	+0.60	1989	1450	99.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	14.3%	-2.86	0–1	—	—	+0.13
20	1992	1578	112.3	—	—	—	—	-16	+43	—	33.3%	-1.39	2–1 (67%)	2–1 (67%)	104.1	-0.40	1990	1594	122.2	—	—	—	—	-34	-2	—	50.9%	+0.26	4–3 (57%)	4–4 (50%)	102.9	+0.71
21	1993	1587	115.3	—	—	—	—	-13	-10	+21	44.2%	-0.48	5–5 (50%)	3–2 (60%)	100.9	-0.63	1991	1714	136.8	—	—	—	—	-190	+100	—	58.1%	+0.87	4–2 (67%)	0–3 (0%)	101.3	+0.08
22	1994	1679	127.7	—	—	—	—	-57	-10	-47	46.6%	-0.03	9–5 (64%)	1–5 (17%)	103.2	+0.22	1992	1741	131.9	—	—	—	—	-208	+113	—	51.4%	-0.15	6–2 (75%)	2–1 (67%)	106.9	-0.32
23	1995	1650	125.3	—	—	—	—	-53	+47	-19	52.1%	+0.49	3–4 (43%)	2–10 (17%)	92.8	+0.84	1993	1651	114.5	—	—	—	—	-126	+136	—	41.9%	-0.50	4–2 (67%)	5–3 (63%)	104.1	+0.44
24	1996	1712	137.8	—	—	—	—	-18	+33	—	52.0%	0.00	7–5 (58%)	7–2 (78%)	105.7	-0.02	1994	1575	109.2	—	—	—	—	-11	+87	—	41.7%	-0.46	2–2 (50%)	3–5 (38%)	97.3	+1.56
25	1997	1720	140.6	—	—	—	—	-7	+28	-87	45.2%	-0.34	6–6 (50%)	2–4 (33%)	100.3	-1.88	1995	1542	100.6	—	—	—	—	-20	—	—	0.0%	-2.83	—	0–1	—	-0.22
26	1998	1901	156.1	—	—	—	—	-35	-31	—	54.9%	+0.30	14–6 (70%)	5–5 (50%)	107.1	-5.73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1999	1784	146.6	—	—	—	—	+15	+17	-174	57.7%	+0.55	6–11 (35%)	4–4 (50%)	90.7	-2.27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2000	1710	130.6	—	—	—	—	+9	+70	—	47.5%	-0.08	6–4 (60%)	1–5 (17%)	98.3	-1.05	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2001	1768	141.2	—	—	—	—	+7	+61	-115	58.6%	+0.43	19–7 (73%)	5–8 (38%)	105.4	+1.52	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2002	1746	143.3	—	—	—	—	+13	+78	-56	57.4%	+0.56	12–7 (63%)	6–11 (35%)	97.8	+1.12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	2003	1719	134.0	+2.40	+1.09	1.150	52.8%	-95	+122	+158	53.4%	+0.25	8–12 (40%)	8–5 (62%)	97.6	-1.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	2004	1770	142.3	+0.56	+2.59	1.099	52.2%	-28	+126	+91	58.4%	+0.63	16–8 (67%)	8–7 (53%)	107.1	+0.67	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2005	1643	133.1	-0.21	+3.99	1.156	53.4%	-13	+219	+164	53.1%	+0.30	3–7 (30%)	4–2 (67%)	95.9	+0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1944	143.6	+0.84	+2.64	1.135	52.8%	-19	+57	+10	53.0%	+0.21	122–91 (57%)	60–72 (45%)	100.6	-1.05	—	1756	126.9	—	—	—	—	-99	+89	—	47.0%	-0.14	20–13 (61%)	14–17 (45%)	105.2	+1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Silvia Farina Elia's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Elena Likhovtseva	6	4	10	Oct 20, 2005	H2H
Venus Williams	1	8	9	Mar 3, 2005	H2H
Henrieta Nagyova	4	5	9	May 20, 2004	H2H
Magdalena Maleeva	4	5	9	Jun 21, 2003	H2H
Conchita Martínez	2	7	9	Jun 21, 2003	H2H

Emanuela Zardo's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Silvia Farina Elia	1	2	3	Mar 18, 1995	H2H
Barbara Paulus	0	3	3	Jan 18, 1995	H2H
Fang Li	1	2	3	Jun 22, 1994	H2H
Gigi Fernandez	1	2	3	Jan 23, 1994	H2H
Julie Halard-Decugis	1	2	3	Oct 22, 1993	H2H