H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Silvia Farina Elia vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-2
Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1992 Key Biscayne third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 7-5 6-1 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| May 5, 1991* | Taranto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1990* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 6-3 6-1 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Silvia Farina Elia | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |